Thursday, April 16, 2015

Loop the Loop



The idea of using loop antennas to minimize interference and to help dig weak stations from beneath stronger ones on the same frequency may be old hat to many, but the idea evolved for me. Like many other things in my younger days of DX-ing, without a local mentor or access to a lot of printed material, it was a learn as you go process.

The upside of all of that was while learning, I also figured out how to get the effects of a loop without spending a lot of money. Many today may look longingly at some of the commercially built loops for sale or at the projects in publications or on line and find the cost of the loops or the materials puts the idea out of reach. However if one finds it acceptable to make a few compromises that reduce performance only a little or provides a product with something a little less polished in appearance, the cost can be reduced to almost nothing.

My first inkling of the directional affects of loops came when I was using one of my very earliest receivers, my old trusty Watterson five-tube broadcast set. It had the requisite loop on the back and I noticed that when it was placed on the side of my desk to my left, some stations were not as strong as when it was on the desk in front of me, or rotated 90 degrees.

At first this was an annoyance more than anything, because it meant that to hear my favorite Chicago station at night ( of course in the early sixties it was WLS!!) the radio had to be to my left, making use of the desk for homework and other things a little awkward. There was still no clue planted to use the effect to find other stations. Then when I began using an outside antenna connected to the radio, the effect was overridden and more or less forgotten about.

It was when my younger sister got her first portable transistor radio that the impact of a rotatable loop began to be driven home. She received a high quality eight-transistor radio for Christmas one year that was not only highly sensitive, but selective as well. It had an RF stage and two IF's and was small enough to be portable, but large enough to have a five inch long ferrite loop in the top of its little cabinet.

Somehow I managed to get her to let me use it to listen one night...probably with the promise of a couple set of batteries since it went through them like water. Sitting at the the desk, it could pick up stations that the Watterson without the outside antenna could not separate. I was a little annoyed at first that there was no way to connect my outside wire antenna to it and the thought of opening it up to find a way to attach it to the circuit was not an option with my sister watching very closely what I was doing with her prized radio.

The effects of the internal loop on the little radio were amazing to me. First of all, the little radio was picking up by itself most of what I could hear on the Watterson with the outside antenna connected. Rotating the radio did not produce much of a peak in signals, but the nulls were amazingly deep and I could almost make local stations disappear. It was easy to hear KLOU form Lake Charles, Louisiana on 1580 khz despite the presence of a local station, KBGO-AM on 1580. For the first time I found that I could pick out stations on some of the crowded regional channels, in some cases logging two stations and in one case three stations on the same frequency.

I only had the little radio for an hour or so before my sister demanded it back, but a lesson was learned. At some point, a loop antenna would be an asset.

It was a few years later that the next lesson was learned when I was a college student at the University of Houston. My roommate had a Hammurland Super Pro receiver that he had been working on but we didn't have an antenna to connect it to. There was no way to string a wire outside the dorm as I had done while at Texas A&M ( a whole 'nother story!!!) and he wanted to listen to some broadcast DX. I remembered lessons in a radio-tv correspondence course my dad had taken that described tuned loops, but the details were a bit hazy. I remembered that they involved a resonant tuned circuit for the loop and a link coil to provide a low impedance connection to the receiver.

We had some insulated wire and scrounged a broadcast band variable capacitor from an old radio and went to work. But what to make the loop out of was the question. We both spotted a yellow plastic trash can at the same time. Why not? We started out with 15 turns of wire lengthwise over the top and bottom of the trash can and attached the variable cap to make it a parallel tuned circuit. The turns were spaced about a quarter inch apart with the ends of the windings anchored by punching holes in the plastic near the top of the can with an icepick. The coupling coil was spaced over a couple inches and had two turns. We ran a short piece of RG 58 coax we had from the link to the receiver.

The first try near the top of the band resulted in signals, but not too strong. Rotating the capacitor did not result in a peak. Obviously our wild guess on number of turns was off. Checking at the bottom of the band resulted in a peak with the capacitor almost completely open. Obviously too much inductance was the problem. We started removing turns one at a time and when we got down to eleven turns, we could get a peak at the top of the band but not quite at the bottom. The capacitor was of the two gang variety, so a clip lead to parallel the two gangs resulted in a successful resonating at the bottom of the band, and the top could be reached by unclipping the jumper.

The whole project took about thirty minutes. A pretty good null could be obtained and the sensitivity was pretty good. All the “ usual suspects” could be heard...the Chicago stations WLS, WBBM. WGN, WMAQ all were in good...as was WSM Nashville, WWL New Orleans, WLW and WCKY Cincinnati. As a bonus, it appeared that a good bit of the flourescent light noise was reduced.

This was the beginning of my own love affair with the improvised loop. While I have made some “ serious “ loops, including a wood framed three foot wide beauty my dad helped me build years later, to loops inside plastic pipe in a round shape with a neat tuning box at the bottom, there have been many times I have put together impromptu tuned loops almost anywhere. Many times while on engineering trips I have put one together in a hotel room to do some DX-ing or to get rid of noise. Many times these were wound around cardboard boxes of various sizes, a few times around trash cans, and even once around a door ( opening and closing the door had the effect of “rotating” the loop!!)

While some very fine, pretty and well performing loops can be purchased if you want to spend as much as $300, some pretty good performance can be had for next to nothing. The size is not critical, though less than a foot across is about the smallest I have gotten really good DX results with. I can't provide you with exact numbers of turns for various sizes, that can be determined experimentally, thought I would imagine there are formulas that could be used to determine. However the time and effort to do that are greater than just winding one and either adding or taking off turns to get it to resonate.

These impromptu loops don't require exotic materials other than a broadcast variable capacitor. I will admit these are getting harder to come by in recent years, but anyone playing with radios for any amount of time probably has an old tube junker around that could be cannibalized. One could be ( Gasp!) bought through a mail order parts house and kept for DX “emergencies”. Some of these are probably good to have around for various things in a well filled DX-ers junk box anyway. I usually start with ten or eleven turns and just hunting for the resonant spot. An old fashioned grid dip meter could be used to find resonance very quickly. I have never tried one of the fancy new ham antenna analyzers or a loop and am not sure what one of those would really tell you anyway. Maybe someone who knows or who has tried it might add a comment to this blog with their experience.

Impromptu loops are inexpensive and can “grow” anywhere. They are particularly good when traveling precludes carrying a lot of stuff on an airplane ( or doing so would raise eyebrows in the security check!!!).

Coupling to the loop can be done either with feedline or inductive coupling by placing a portable receiver with an internal loop next to the larger loop's windings. I actually did just that using the table top clock radio in hotel room on a trip to the Bahamas once! The loop was wound on a plastic trash can and set on top of a small table in the room and the loop and radio moved around the table for rotation.

While the homemade impromptu loop might not give quite the full performance of a commercially made device or the more complex big ferrite core loops in some ways, its practicality and availability for use outweigh those issues. After all, the idea is “ DX With What You Have” and “ DX Anywhere, Anytime”

By the way,. By adding more turns, these loops do an excellent job on long wave frequencies and work very well for NDB DX-ing, and with fewer turns do the same in the 160 meter amateur band and the lower tropical bands ( 120 and 90 meters) They don't seem to do much better than a random wire up higher.

Have fun!

Thursday, April 2, 2015

Auroral Effects-BCB Possiblities

Many DX-ers might look at aurora as a problem.  The band is dead, higher frequencies are filled with flutter, the usual suspects are gone.  But the recent activity has opened another door.

Recent high level auroras due to solar storm activity and mass ejections have affected prop on Earth. The first effect was noted while making my morning BCB band scan on the way to work.  I usually leave home about an hour before sunrise in winter and spring.  Day to day, I notice some differences in prop, but the pattern is usually similar.  The usual " friends" show up.  Sometimes the lower frequencies are not so good and the Chicago stations on 670, 720 and sometimes 780 are weaker, with 890 being stronger.  Comparisons of them is my usual "barometer" for what is happening. If 670 and 720 are weak,  I run more through the higher frequencies and they usually are OK.

In those cases 830 from Minneapolis will be weak, but 1500 from St Paul ( just  "next door") will be strong, as will be 1530 from Cincinnati.  Closer to sunrise,  840 from Louisville will be weaker as will 750 from Atlanta and 870 from New Orleans. That will leave Mexican stations audible.  If Atlanta is already gone, there is little chance of hearing Cubans because the sun is already up there.
If the closer stations are strong,  the Cubans or South Americans will not be audible.

At the same time, 850 from Denver and 1160 from Salt Lake City will be in as the Eastern stations disappear as the sun is rising in those areas. The Eastern Time Zone Mexican stations disappear and the Western more stations start appearing.  Its a matter of letting the sun become a  "barrier" to let different stations be heard.

Some mornings the skip is still uniform,  just shorter.  On those mornings I will note that Kansas City on 710 will cover Amarillo, with 810 and 980 from Kansas City also rolling in.  On those mornings, 880 from Lexington, Nebraska will be in strong as will 580 from Topeka, Kansas.  Shreveport on 1130, Tulsa on 1170 and St Louis on 1120 will be particularly dominant on their channels. Other mornings Mexican stations might appear either behind them, or sometimes even above them.

But on a strong auroral morning, things are very different.  The northern stations are gone. There are no Chicagos, no Minneapolis,  no Louisville, no Salt Lake, maybe even no St Louis.  Even in the earlier hours well before sunset, these "regulars" will be totally gone here in Central Texas.

Is the band dead?  Absolutely not!  At his latitude, the auroral effect is only on those stations in or not too far south of the zone. What happens is that weaker or more distant stations to the south or on my own latitude that are normally masked are suddenly available.  Cuban channels normally blocked by strong US stations are suddenly in the clear.  many might be lower powered stations. Normally unheard  Mexican stations or even Central or South American stations appear.  Stations from the Southwestern US are in,  not stronger, just no longer covered.

An enterprising DX-er in moderate latitudes would do well to keep an eye on Space Weather dot com or other sites that post warnings of solar activity.  Just as VHF amateur or TV and FM DX-ers watch weather maps for approaching cold fronts,  BCB DX-ers should watch solar weather for opportunities or times to particularly try to be tuning in.  You can take advantage of an auroral "curtain" to log some new ones,  just as we daily use the sunrise or sunset lines as curtains to block strong signals to allow weaker ones in.  The main difference is the sunset/sunrise lines are generally for East/West advantages, but the auroral curtain will be for North/South advantages.

Aurora also provides some rather unique opportunities for VHF DX-ers,  but that's a story for another day!

( Listening here is done in Central Texas with home receivers now being an ICOM R-75, Hallicrafters SX-96, Yaesu FT-757-GX, Drake 2B, Hallicrafters SX-111, Hammurland HQ-170,
Mackay LF maritime receiver and BC-342. Antennas are a 95 foot top fed sloper up 45 feet, a 130 foot Inverted L with 40 foot vertical section, various short verticals and a 3 foot home made box loop. Mobile listening is done with the standard receiver in a 1999 Ford Ranger pickup)

Sunday, March 22, 2015

Thoughts While Band Seems Dead

     It has been awhile since I have posted anything.  I guess it is a lack of discipline or perhaps a simple lack of  time or choosing between spending a little time on the radio rather than writing.  This morning the bands seem very poor, though I know its just a matter of prop being "different"...the bands are very seldom truly all dead except during a severe solar disturbance.  The Russian DX contest has just ended and many DX-ers have shut down and are not randomly looking for things.  Its early in the morning and the higher bands are just not open yet.
     Checking the WWV frequencies here at the Central Texas QTH, I find the following in a quick sweep beginning at 1158 GMT:
2500 khz   WWV S-9+20 DB with WWVH Well audible behind it on USB about the same level at S-9+ 10 DB,
10000 khz WWVH S-9+10 DB with WWV just audible
The signals on 15, 20 and 25 mhz were totally inaudible.
     No DX signals heard on 160 or 80, only domestic rag chewing.  On 40 meters several signals heard on cw that made no sense meaning probably QSO's in a language other than English.  I did log three JA stations calling CQ.  On 30 meters there was one W4 calling CQ with a weak signal but that was to be expected from the way the WWV and WWVH signals were coming in, the band is just very long. The New York Radio VOLMET station on 10051 was about S-9 as was its Canadian counterpart when it came on.  Probably a good time to make coffee and have a spot of breakfast and come  back in a few minutes to find things better.
     It might also be time to consider writing my blog entries as I go in a little less formal manner on the laptop at the radio desk rather than putting down the info later.  It will probably mean more entries even if they are not quite as literary!

Monday, July 21, 2014

July 20, 2014 Six Meter Opening


This past weekend (July 19-20, 2014)was a flurry of activity in a short period of time. Company in the house had kept time before the radios to a minimum, but a short period Sunday afternoon more than made up for it.

A friend  had antenna trouble earlier in the week and I managed to take time off from visiting to run by his house and help him trouble shoot the problem. During the course of the visit, we talked about six meters and talked about a quick way to get an antenna up for at least listening on the band. The idea of a wire antenna was already on the table because of my somewhat success in using my 90 foot sloper as an interim antenna on six and the discussion turned in that direction.

We looked at how it is common practice to use a forty meter antenna on fifteen meters. The third harmonic relationship of those two bands means that a half wave antenna on forty becomes a 3/2 wave antenna on fifteen, matching fifty ohms rather closely on both bands. In fact, any half number of half waves will do the same.

Looking at his space available, it was determined that there was room for a 7/2 waves antenna for six meters, it turning out to be about 63 feet long. Interestingly enough, this also would make the antenna useful in the forty meter 'phone band! It was decided he would try putting it up in an inverted Vee configuration as is common for HF operation.

Sunday afternoon, he told me that he had the antenna up and it matched up pretty well without a tuner on six.. As I returned from a road trip taking our visitors back, I got a text from him, first saying he had worked a South Carolina station ( from his  Central Texas QTH) on six with good signals and that there appeared to be a contest on. Just a short time later he had worked 12 stations in 7 states. The top of the wire was probably about 30 feet up.

I checked the contest calendar as I settled back in and noticed that it was the weekend for the CQ World Wide VHF Contest...but it was ending just as I sat down. Since my friend had mentioned the band was open, I decided to tune through the band anyway, if nothing else to see if a few beacons were coming through. I also figured that if the band was really open, a few operators would continue to try to work some VHF DX even if the contest period was over.

Turned out I was right on both counts. Just tuning up from the bottom of the band up to the area where I often hear beacons ( 50060-50080) I quickly ran into an extremely strong signal from WZ8D, on 50067.25 indicated on the R-75 Signal was S-9, sometimes hitting 10 DB over S-9! Yep, there was a band opening! This was at 2106 GMT, just six minutes past the end of the contest.

The receiver was in the wide bandwidth, and I could hear another somewhat weaker signal adjacent, so switching in the 250 Hz filters, it was easy to separate out WA3TTS/B, another beacon on 50068.5 indicated, not quite as strong, but very respectable.

Over the next half hour or so, the following appeared in the reception log ( all times GMT)

2108 W8IF/B 50079.25 579 CW Beacon
2112 WD8CW 50098.2 559 CW calling CQ
2113 K8LEE 50077.9 589 CW Calling CQDX
2114 N5DG 50104.5 549 CW Calling CQDX
(very weak at times, deep fading and a flutter, almost buzz modulated-backscatter?)
2115 K4RX 50103.5 559 CW Calling CQDX
2121 AC4TO 50107 539 CW working another station
2123 AB5EB 50106.25 559 CW Calling CQ DX(fluttery)
2124 KB9AX 50106.5 589 CW Signing with another station
2129 KD8NYL 50130.2 57 SSB In QSO
2130 K4RX 50103.2 589 CW Calling CQDX
2133 WA9IOC 50094 579
2134 W9CPV 50093.25 569 CW
2135 WR9L/B 50074.4 579C CW Beacon
2136 W0FY 50074.4 579 CW Beacon
2137 K0KP 50073.4 589 CW Beacon
2141 K8TB 50065.3 549 CW Beacon
2142 W8EH 50060.6 579 CW Beacon
2144 W0ZF 50128.1 58 SSB
2147 KG9Z 50096.1 579 CW CQ

It might be worth watching the VHF publications and other blogs, because I heard some of the stations apparently working Europeans, though they were not audible to me. I heard at least two stations appearing to exchange signal reports with an ON station and one with an Italian.

It was also interesting to note that relatively nearby stations ( near in the overall scheme of things, not actually local in the Waco area) were obviously multi path back scatter signals with echo, flutter and almost a sound of being modulated by a buzz.
 
I continue to be intrigued about the idea of using long wire antennas for VHF. There is gain to be had and the multiplicity of lobes makes reception from various directions possible.  It can also allow operation or reception quickly without complicated antenna construction.  Not to say that it would equal stacked multi element yagis, but the inability to get those up should not be a reason not to get on the air or to listen. Feedline does become a consideration, however, as losses at these frequencies are higher and at least a fair match is necessary to avoid even greater losses. open wire line might be a consideration and experimentation is on tap for that here.

I would be interested in hearing from anyone else who noted this opening or others, particularly anyone in Europe who noted it or even heard some US stations.

This opening was particularly interesting because this week has been marked by a very quiet sun, few if any sunspots. All during the week, the upper bands have been poor or totally silent here, thought 20 meters has continued to surprise with openings to Russia and Asia in the 0200-0300 time period.

I hope to have more time to explore what is going on with the bands this week. This past week was filled with visiting grandbabies, and after all, this is “ just a hobby.”



Monday, July 14, 2014

Wake Me When the Band Opens


Wake Me When the band Opens
Sometimes we need to be awakened when the bands are open. It might not seem there is much there and it becomes easy to doze at the controls and just go off and do something else. Maybe we are just hearing the same old stations or maybe we get a little jaded and long for the “real DX” when there is still plenty to be had right in front of us. Maybe we just need to listen a little deeper into the noise. Sometimes it can be a matter of looking back over old waters that we thought had been fished out.

Such was the case this past weekend when C1AT, my second op, found the bands a little boring. The past several days—in fact most of the past week—had seen the low frequencies clobbered with QRN. Static crashes from thunderstorms had entered the headphones and were like a hammer that delivered well directed blows to the head.

So when the weekend came, C1AT suggested starting at mid day with a WWV sweep to see if the higher bands held promise. There was supposed to be a high level of solar activity toward the end of the week and if there were indeed blackouts perhaps the residual ionization might make the high bands better a few days later.

Starting the sweep at 25 MHz was not promising. WWV was a just audible carrier and no signs of WWVH. The 20 MHz stop showed a very strong WWV at S-9+ and very steady, indicative of good short skip. At that point C1AT yawned. OK, lets check 15 MHz. Hmm, S-9 +20DB with WWV on top and WWVH just barely audible behind. At this point C1AT put her head on her paws and uttered tose words,

“Wake me up when the bands open.”

Of course for real DX at midday in Central Texas ( 1700 GMT) it was hardly worth checking 10 MHZ, but I gave it a whirl: WWV was along at S-9+20 DB and steady, and just barely audible at 5 MHz, inaudible at 2.5.

A quick check of 6 meters, looking for some Sporadic E almost woke the cat up. There did not appear to be any activity to speak of and one beacon came through: W3DOG/B on 50017. As soon as she heard that call sign, she cafe a sniff and dropped back off. A swing though the phone band found one station calling CQ on 50135. A little adrenalin pumped when I heard “ Kilo papa 4” a few times with an incomplete call. Turned out to be a KP4/W3. Still DX by 6-meter standards, but short of entering the “ countries” column. And he faded quickly and disappeared, leaving a sea of white noise very conducive to snoozing.

A sweep of 10 meters saw little activity. Many beacons were there, but most operators must have been lulled to sleep by DX boredom. How could they? The band was obviously open to much of the US and the XE1RCS beacon on 28183.4 was quite strong. The somewhat chirpy but very familiar sound of the PY2WFG beacon was there on 29203.3. The West Coast was represented by K6LLL/B on 28203.5 almost colliding with him. And YV5LIX was very strong on 28215. There were other beacons audible from various call areas of the US, at least one other XE a VE7 and a few other Brazilians. Where were the “ live operators”?

Snoozing, I guess.

A trip to 12 meters found no signals at all. None! Fifteen was pretty light. A “7” on SSB along with a TG9 from Guatemala. Slipping down to the cw portion, at 1732 found a station involved in an obvious rag chew style contact, very strong, very steady. Was this another Stateside short skip station? Probably. C1AT snoozed on. But wait! When he signed, it was F6FPU! France with a good, strong, steady signal into Texas. The W3 station he was working was weak and warbly, sure signs of the band being very, very long.

But that was all. Further up the band, there were numerous strong US stations around 21050 taking part in the Weekend Sprint contest for straight key operators. NC1M was 599+20 DB! Maybe the W3 above had just had his beam turned toward Europe and had little signal toward Texas. Maybe C1AT was right. The eyelids were getting a little heavy from hearing the steady “ hiss” from the receiver undisturbed by DX dits and dahs.

Lets check 17 meters. A little excitement when an EA9 showed up with a little pileup on 18070.6, then CT8/DL5NUA on 18075.2 with a fair signal, followed by DL1MD...but then not much.

When one pond shows no fish, try something else. Lets go looking for SWBC stations. Its been awhile since we had done a good sweep of the higher SWBC bands in mid day.

Thirteen meters is the first stop. Will anything be there?

1758 GMT RNE 21610 S-9 Noblejas, Spain
1800 GMT WHRI 21600 S-7 Cypress Creek USA

And that was that! OK, lets look at 16 meters:

1804 (All GMT) VOA 17895 S-9+20db Greenville USA
1805 BBCWS(FR) 17885 S-9 QSB Ascension
1806 RNE 17850 S-9+10DB Noblejas, Spain
1807 WRMI 17790 S-9+30 DB Okeechobee, USA
1809 RNE 17755 S-6 Noblejas, Spain
1810 RNE 17715 S-9 QSB Noblejas, Spain
1812 AIR (!!) 17670 S-5 QSB Dehli, India


Ah, one little jewel. The lists show this last one to be a non directional service. Maybe a yawner to some, but it made at least an interesting entry. The rest of the session was spent with a sweep of 19 meters that did not turn up anything earth shattering, but was still useful to stay familiar with the band. There was one nice logging at 1818 on 15650 from Greece and another of the VOA station in Botswana at 1820 on 15580 that took a little digging to hear well enough to ID, peakinga bout S-5. The rest were routine except for Radio Sultanate of Oman at 1835 on 15140 with a very nice signal.

Not earth shattering DX, but still a fun couple hours in front of the radio. And yet another lesson in finding DX when the band does not appear to be exactly hopping. Even afer all these years, signals from Botswana and Oman are still pretty exciting.

And C1AT? She said to wake her up when Masterpiece Theater came on...

Sunday, July 6, 2014

Flashback: The Doomed Beam Antenna



A few months into my Novice amateur radio career, I was beginning to feel the nibblings of the DX bug pretty bad. A magazine article and a project in the ARRL Antenna Book had me anxious to try building a small beam antenna. The antenna had a small boom and a moderate amount of gain and appeared to be something we could build at home. It was thus that at age 13, my first beam project lived, and died.

The antenna was a two element phased affair known as the “ ZL Special”. I am not sure where the name came from but it brought forth visions of working many of them on fifteen meters. There are literally dozens of articles about the design on the internet now, but then all I had was a few paragraphs in the ARRL Antenna Handbook ( 1961 Edition!)

The antenna is basically two folded dipoles spaced a short distance apart and connected with a transposed phasing line. The articles about it indicated that this resulted in a 135-degree phase difference between the elements. It can be built like a small two element yagi, and fed directly with 52 or 75 ohm line.

I had planned to make it with two pieces of TV twin lead and just hang it in the air, then wondered aloud if it could be made with a wood frame to support the elements. My dad once again jumped into the project and we soon had a frame built out of material from his carpenter's equivalent to a parts “ junk box”. He had material stored that was left over from numerous past projects and remodel jobs. It was to be a lesson in antenna construction for both of us.

It was decided the antenna would be mounted on one of the wood masts for my longwire. The longwire I had was suspended between two wooden masts consisting of 2X4's using rebar as steep angle guys.( My dad never built anything half-way. Those masts had triangular concrete foundations) It would be supported by a short piece of water pipe that would be attached to the mast with a pair of angle iron brackets that would be placed around the mast rather than weaken the wood mast by drilling holes through it. The angle iron came from an old bed frame that turned out to be a source of hardware for a number of antenna projects over the years!

The boom for the antenna was only about five feet long and was to be a 2X4 with a threaded floor flange being the means of attaching it to the water pipe support. The elements would be the twin lead supported by thin rippings of redwood. The twin lead was tied to the supports with monofilament fishing line at about six inch intervals. It was fed with 75 ohm twin lead. This and all my antenna projects were low budget, all built with what was available. The 75 ohm twin lead was two cents per foot in 1963.

The antenna masts were both already designed to be tilt-over affairs so attaching the antenna assembly was not too difficult. It took us the better part of a Saturday to put the beast together and get it into the back yard. At that point we learned just what “heavy duty construction” means.

Dark was falling when we were finally ready to raise the antenna. In order to lift all the weight of the wood mast, we got on the roof to pull on a rope attached to the top of the mast. W had the mast sitting it up on a sawhorse to have it off the ground a bit and to give us a little better pulling angle. Once we got it vertical, it was a matter of putting in a locking pin through the lower part of the mast and reattaching the guy lines. The masts were guyed with pieces of iron reinforcement rod such as is used in concrete and came down within two feet of the base of the mast, making the mast almost like a small tower. My dad really did not like the idea of wire guy lines cluttering up the yard.

There was no rotator for the antenna. We had a light rope dropped to allow the antenna to be pulled in different directions then tied off. It was about 22-feet off the ground. The brackets holding the mast were larger than the mast pipe with a sleeve pipe over it, allowing the antenna mast freedom of motion. The lower of the two brackets supported its weight on an old wheel bearing. My dad was pretty resourceful about such things.

There was little wind when we got the antenna in place. It was also about dark. It would be the next day before the trouble showed up.

Because it was after dark, the 15-meter band was dead and devoid of signals with which to test the antenna. It tuned up fine, actually loading up much easier than the longwires did on 15 meters. It also showed much less power line noise than did the wires. That might have been because it was directional and was turned at right angles to the power lines.

I called a friend of mine across town to get on the air to try it out. I started out with it turned toward him. He was across Waco from me, probably about 12 miles away by air. The initial word was good. I was much stronger there than I had been on my old inverted V and somewhat stronger than on the longwires. Turning the antenna 180 degrees showed a good drop in signal and turning it 90 degrees to him had me almost disappearing. The initial feeling was that it was working well.

The big test would be the next day. I had a weekly schedule with a station in the state of Washington and that would tell the tale of whether the antenna would really work better than what I had been using. Images of large numbers of DX QSL cards began to appear in my head.

The next morning, the wind was up a bit. As we backed out of the driveway to go to church, my dad and I noticed that the elements were hopping a bit in the wind. He noted that they appeared to catch the wind quite a bit.

By the time we got back from church, the wind had picked up quite a bit. I went out back to try to turn the antenna to the northwest to set up for my schedule. It was a real fight getting it swung around. Winds were up around 20 to 30 miles per hour by that time and it was obvious that something about the wood elements was really catching the wind. The ends were moving a foot or more up and down continuously. The wood mast was creaking and swinging within the constrains of its guys.

About that time, my friend had driven over to see what we had built and as he and my dad came out it was obvious that the antenna or mast might not survive. Rather than loose the whole thing, it was decided to try to take it down.

That decision was almost a disaster in itself. It took all three of us hanging on ropes to lower the mast that by that time was bucking and twisting wildly. We got the thing down, took the brackets off the mast and raised it back up where it seemed to heave a sigh of relief at just holding up the wires again.

The doomed ZL Special never came up off the ground again. Within days it was disassembled and the twin lead went into my own parts junk box for use another day. Thus were lessons learned at an early age about light weight antenna construction and the effects of wind loading!

Sunday, June 22, 2014

New Operating Position

This week I had time to spend in front of the radios following a complete makeover of a room in our house--new paint, new floor, a long awaited removal of a bar that opened an alcove and a place to bring the radios into a designed for usage, real indoor shack. I wonder how many of you have a planned area for the radios or if they just find a place to land and get used there?

My dad had built a desk for my radios several years ago, but for the past 25 or so it has been used more as a bookcase and "business" desk and a place for the computer. Now its being used for which it was designed. I have my primary radios all in one place ( though if my life is any indicator, there may be some shuffling later!) sitting on a slightly elevated shelf with the knobs at the right height, accessories with their own shelf and spaces, holes for cables, good place for a desk lamp and clock. It's wonderful! And it only took 16 years to get done!
Radio Desk


For now the primary radios are a Yaesu FT-757-GX for both hamming and SWL DX with special filters for SSB and CW, my Icom R-75 with dual 250 Hz cw filters and special AM and SSB filters in a modification, an old Icom 251 all mode 2 meter rig for SSB and CW DX and an old favorite, my Hallicrafters SX-96 for SWBC and BCB-DX...all in a row. Some of my other receivers are stacked above along with a couple transmitters.  You might recognize a Heathkit DX-40, Knight VFO, Drake 2B with Q-multiplier and speaker, MacKay vintage shipboard receiver. Eico 723 transmitter and 722 VFO and a fifties vintage Montgomery Ward Airline broadcast receiver.

I wonder why this took so long! There are even good places for current logbooks and my cw keys that can be far enough back for my forearm to be comfy. And there is a great spot for the flat screen computer monitor at eye level out of the way of the radios! My late dad would be proud to see it put to its proper use. And I am amazed at the thought he put into designing the desk for best use. Anyone else designed a special shack? Or like my old ones, did it just grow on its own? Now if I just had the matching Hallicrafters speaker to go with the SX-96....

Second Op-C1AT